Browsing Category

The Kibble Awards aim to encourage Australian women writers to improve and advance literature for the benefit of our community.

The Awards recognise the works of women writers of fiction or non-fiction classified as ‘life writing’. This includes novels, click autobiographies, biographies, literature and any writing with a strong personal element.

The Kibble Literary Award recognises the work of an established Australian woman writer while the Dobbie Literary Award recognises a first published work from an Australian woman writer.

The Stella Count statistics compiled by the Stella Prize in conjunction with Books + Publishing show the ratio of books by men and women reviewed in major Australian newspapers and literary review publications. It also indicates the genders of literary reviewers, and provides information on whether books by male freecialiscoupon or female writers are reviewed by male or female reviewers.

The Stella Prize is a major literary award celebrating Australian women’s writing.

The prize is named after one of Australia’s iconic female authors, Writing Critical Essays – Online Service for Critical Essay Help Stella Maria Sarah ‘Miles’ Franklin, and was awarded for the first time in 2013. Both nonfiction and fiction books by Australian women are eligible for entry.

No Chicks No Excuses is the brainchild of Leslie Cannold,  Jane Caro and Catherine Deveny, three women in public life who got tired of event organisers saying they couldn’t find good women speakers.

When event organisers tell sildenafil generic us they can’t find women speakers we ask Where have you looked?”

The search is over, the answer is here. No Chicks No Excuses – expert women for every event.

We want LOL to excite, inspire and encourage through profiling young women who are making it happen on their own and providing insights as to how they’re doing it.

We publish zines, run workshops, parties, create films, make and sell a range of sildenafilonlinebuy fun merchandise, and provide the tools to assist up and coming creative people in pursuit of their passions.

cc licensed flickr user ginnerobot

Committee Secretary
Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee
PO Box 6100
Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600


RE: Impact of the 2014 and 2015 Commonwealth Budget decisions on the Arts and the appropriateness of the establishment of a National Programme for Excellence in the Arts



Women in Literary Arts Australia (WILAA) is deeply worried by the decisions made about Federal arts funding in the 2015 Budget.


As a recently launched initiative aimed at supporting women in all fields of literary arts, we are a fledgling organisation that has come about due to the concern that women writers face discrimination and barriers to participation within our industries. Our work is just beginning, and we are operating on the goodwill of volunteers and our own financial backing. We receive no government, philanthropic or private sector funding.


Women are paid less than their male counterparts in all areas of the creative arts, in line with the national wage gap. To further restrict funding to the sector will disproportionately impact women in our industries.


In the complex web of interconnections between small to medium arts organisations, individual artists and major arts organisations, funding cuts in one area do not occur in a vacuum. When funding is decreased for small organisations and individuals, loss of the valuable contributions they make to the broader industry will be sorely felt, not just in the short term when projects and programs are cut, but in the long term when the dearth of practitioners and innovation are felt at the major arts organisations. A focus on funding excellence at the expense of development risks not having a next generation of writers, artists and arts managers to create excellent work.


Writers, like other artists, require investments of time and labour to become good at their craft. Small to medium arts organisations are key to their development. Without writers’ groups, festivals, online magazines, workshops, literary journals, zines, development programs and projects which meet the needs of these writers, we risk losing much of the breadth and variety of work which currently exists. Not only will fewer works be created, but fewer readers will be engaged with Australian literature.


As the statistics of the Stella Count have proven, women’s literature is afforded less coverage and discussion in the public realm. Further cuts to the arts will mean a further reduction in visibility for the artistic works of women. The loss of these unique capacity-building, training, development and research initiatives could see us risk the next generations of cultural workers and Australia’s reputation for cultural ambition and excellence.


Opportunities for women, indigenous, disability and other marginalised community groups will inevitably be reduced under Brandid’s proposed cuts. With a significant wage gap for women already impacting their ability to contribute financial and social capital to the development of their art, we will see more women forced to withdraw from the sector. The changes will create an additional barrier to entry and access for diverse practitioners and organisations and move more funding to major organisations, which are already criticised for a lack of diversity (of form, story, artists, participants and audiences).


We support the Australia Council as an independent arm’s length statutory body free from political influence. The Australia Council has provided a mechanism for independent arts funding for more than 40 years, with grants being fully accountable and applicants being assessed by qualified industry peers. This rigorous process has ensured decisions are made by experts in a particular art form and independent of political and other potential pressures.


On behalf of our community, participants and audiences, we seek a reversal of the cuts to the Australia Council and an assurance that visit this federal arts funding will continue to be administered through an accountable, arms-length, peer-reviewed processes.





Lefa Singleton Norton

Founder of WILAA

July 2015

When we say ‘women in literary arts’, who exactly do we mean? When we were searching for the right name for our initiative, we wanted to convey that we’re open to all women working with words, stories and communication.

Literary arts is canadian viagra a term we landed on because it seemed more encompassing of those women who might not identify as ‘writers’ or part of the publishing industry. We had in mind comic book artists, songwriters, zinesters, playwrights, comedians; artists that often fall through the cracks of traditional organisations and groups. WILAA is an umbrella organisation, and we want women of all artforms relating to storytelling and words to feel as if we have something to offer them.


We use an inclusive definition of “woman” and “female” and we welcome trans women, genderqueer women, and non-binary people.

The OpEd Project 2012 Byline Report tracks the ideas and individuals that are most Canadian Viagra Online – the best medication for treatment ED! influential  –  shaping public opinion and policy, driving resources and talent, and assigning meaning to the world, in our national and global public conversation.

The Global Media Monitoring Project click (GMMP) maps the representation of women and men in news media worldwide.

On 10 November 2009, 1,281 newspapers, television and radio stations were monitored in 108 countries for the fourth GMMP. The research covered 16,734 news items, 20,769 news personnel (announcers, presenters and reporters), and 35,543 total news subjects.

VIDA’s mission as a research-driven organisation is to increase critical attention to contemporary women’s writing what is an expository essay as well as further transparency around gender equality issues in contemporary literary culture.

Each year The VIDA Count compiles over 1000 data points from the top tier, or “Tier 1” journals, publications, and press outlets. Volunteers from across the country dedicate thousands of combined hours to compile this information and release the results as our trademark blue and red pie charts.

Pitch, Bitch! is an exhortation and a resource. We wanna close the “confidence gap” and the gender disparity in pitching and getting published. Here you will find advice, enthusiasms and conversations about being a female writer. Non-binary and genderqueer writers welcome too!

Female writers: go forth heartened and equipped and encouraged.

The first Wednesday of every month is #pitchbitch day. Use it to work on a pitch, research a pitch, or send a pitch.

Women in Media is a networking initiative for women in media formed out of a belief that solidarity in journalism was vital in ensuring good working conditions, more opportunities for women and credible journalism.

With the proud support of MEAA and the Walkley Foundation for Journalism, WiM will continue the great work of WA colleagues and expand the network nationally to increase website like this networking opportunities for women working in media, improve workforce outcomes and provide valuable mentoring from senior industry leaders for younger and mid-career women.